home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp.hut.fi!usenet
- From: oahvenla@hyppynaru.cs.hut.fi (Osma Ahvenlampi)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.networking
- Subject: Re: AWeb on DraCo (was: Re: AWeb and GIF datatypes)
- Date: 08 Apr 1996 18:17:36 +0300
- Organization: What, me, organised?
- Sender: oahvenla@hyppynaru.cs.hut.fi
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <jdjvija68z3.fsf@hyppynaru.cs.hut.fi>
- References: <19960405.7A32D98.10CCA@localhost.UUCP>
- <jdjhguwgguo.fsf@hyppynaru.cs.hut.fi> <ehb.056c@draco.prima.ruhr.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hyppynaru.cs.hut.fi
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-reply-to: ehb@draco.prima.ruhr.de's message of Mon, 8 Apr 96 00:03:08 +0200
- X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1
-
- In article <ehb.056c@draco.prima.ruhr.de> ehb@draco.prima.ruhr.de (Edwin H. Bielawski) writes:
- >May be, but the normal enforcer would never display such silly
- >accesses like WORD READ from 00000004!
-
- Never tried that, but I suppose it wouldn't. Still, accessing 00000004
- IS legal. And I still can't believe AWeb is doing that. While you are
- seeing DraCo software complain about something a task does, what
- you're NOT seeing (as I am, because I don't just run Enforcer, but
- SegTracker as well) is what segment list those accesses were from. If
- you did, you'd probably notice that the access didn't happen inside
- AWeb code, but inside some datatype or library code.
-
- --
- Forenoon, n. The latter part of the night. Vulgar.
- | "Osma Ahvenlampi" <mailto:oa@iki.fi> <http://www.iki.fi/oa/> |
- | Amiga&BeBox&ClassAct&Voodoo&ARTech cool stuff: I-Net225&AWeb |
- --
-